Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 72029 (KAR)

SMT NAGALAKSHMI v. B LAKSHMIDEVI

MFA/1425/2022 · 2025-12-13

Lok Adalath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2025 CONCILIATORS PRESENT: THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI & SRI. RAVI S. SAMPRATHI, MEMBER M.F.A.No.1425/2022 (Lok Adalat No.8540/2025) BETWEEN: 1. SMT NAGALAKSHMI AGE ABOUT 31 YEARS W/OLATE SHIVASHANKARA 2. CHAITHANYA KUMAR AGED ABOUT 10 YEARS S/O LATE SHIVASHANKARA 3. CHETAN AGED ABOUT 08 YEARS S/ O LATE SHIVASHANKARA 4. LAKSHMANA S/O LATE BHEEMAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS 5. SMT. PARVATHAMMA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS W/O LAKSHMANA Digitally signed by DEEPU M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA 2 APPELLANT NO.2 & 3 ARE MINORS REP. BY MOTHER APPELLANT NO.1 ALL ARE RESIDING AT KYATAGANAKERE NAGALAMADIKE HOBLI, PAVAGADA TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT – 572 122 ...APPELLANTS (BY SRI.MUSHTAQ AHMED, ADVOCATE) AND 1. B.LAKSHMIDEVI AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS W/O NAGABHUSHANA R/O NO. 2/475, III ROAD BANK SIDE, SURYA PUBLIC SCHOOL ANANTHAPURA AND DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH – 572 122. 2. ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD., TD BHAVAN MISSION, 1ST FLOOR 2ND FLOOR, HVR COMPLEX NO.89, HOSUR MAIN ROAD MADIVALA BANGALORE – 560 028 REP. BY ITS MANAGER ….RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. P.S.JAGADISH, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 14.08.2017 PASSED IN MVC NO.215/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC MACT, PAVAGADA, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED: 3 CONCILIATION ORDER The learned Counsel appearing for the Appellants - Claimants is present. The learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent – Insurance Company along with its representative are present. 2. After prolonged negotiations, the matter is settled. A joint memo signed by the learned advocate appearing for the appellants/claimants (being authorized by the appellants/claimants to sign) and the learned advocate appearing for the respondent-Insurance Company and its authorized officer is filed. The appellants-claimants have agreed to receive and the respondent - Insurance Company has agreed to pay a lump-sum of Rs.7,50,000/- (Rupees Seven Lakhs Fifty Thousand only), in addition to what has been awarded by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim. 3. The Respondent - Insurance Company has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within six weeks from the date of preparation of award, failing which, the said amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% P.A. from the date of default, till the date of deposit. 4. The apportionment, deposit and release of the enhanced compensation amount shall be made in terms of the judgment and award passed by the claims tribunal. 4 5. This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint memo. The Judgment and Award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER TS