Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 72024 (KAR)

SMT JAYASHREE A v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/14515/2024 · 2025-12-01

S Sunil Dutt Yadav

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49956 WP No. 14515 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 14515 OF 2024 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT JAYASHREE A W/O LATE KUSUMADHARA H, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, C/O MAHABALA GOWDA A, ALETHADKA HOUSE, PERLAMPADY POST, KOLTHIGE VILLAGE, PUTTUR TALUK, D K-574212 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MOULYA S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560001. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR D K DISTRICT, MANGALURU. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, PUTTUR, D K DISTRICT. Digitally signed by VIJAYA P Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49956 WP No. 14515 of 2024 4. THASHILDHAR, KADABA TALUK, D K - 574 221. 5. SMT. BALAKKA W/O LATE MONAPPA GOWDA, 6. VASUDEVA H S/O LATE MONAPPA GOWDA, 7. CHIDANANDA H S/O LATE MONAPPA GOWDA, R5 TO R7 ARE R/AT HOSOLIGE HOUSE, KAYMANE POST, BELANDOOR VILLAGE, KADABA TALUK, D K - 574 202. …RESPONDENTS THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 04.12.2023 PASSED BY THE THASILDAR KADABA T.Q. D.K DISTRICT AND ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE R4/THAHSILDAR OF KADABA TQ. D.K DISTRICT TO ENTER PETITIONERS NAME AS PER PETITIONERS APPLICATION (ANNEXURE-C), IN THE KHATHA/RTC OF THE PROPERTY OF KHATHA (SY NO. 99/2) MEASURING 0.69 ACRE) SITUATED IN BELANDOOR VILLAGE, KADABA T.Q., D.K DISTRICT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49956 WP No. 14515 of 2024 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV ORAL ORDER Office objections were raised on 04.06.2024. Despite several opportunities, out of the 13 office objections, not even one office objection has been complied with. There was no representation on 21.11.2025. When the matter is called out today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Taking note of absence of diligence in prosecuting the proceedings, petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE PSJ CT-SG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 76