IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.101 Ajay Kumar @ Ajay State of Haryana and others CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON'BLE M Present : Ms. Harshita Mr.P.P.Chahar, Sr. DAG DEEPAK SIBAL, J (1) At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that her prayer to the issuance of directions to respondent No.3 Charkhi Dadri, District Charkhi Dadri 20.05.2025 (Annexure P Dadri, Haryana for grant of parole to the petitioner, as the sam decision since 20.05.2025 (2) Learned State counsel has no objection to the acceptance of the afore alternate prayer made on behalf of the petitioner. (3) After hearing learned counsel for the parties and going through the record, we find that the decision on the unnecessarily delayed by the State which is also against the spirit behind Section 12 of the Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 2022. (4) In the light of the direction to respondent No. made on 20.05.2025 of a copy of this order, in accorda 02.07.2025 vandana Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Ajay Kumar @ Ajay Versus and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Ms. Harshita Kalra, Advocate, for the petitioner. P.P.Chahar, Sr. DAG., Haryana. * * * * * DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that prayer to the issuance of directions to respondent No.3 Charkhi Dadri, District Charkhi Dadri to finally dispose of the 20.05.2025 (Annexure P-1) presented before the Jail Authorities, District Jail, for grant of parole to the petitioner, as the sam 20.05.2025. Learned State counsel has no objection to the acceptance of the afore alternate prayer made on behalf of the petitioner. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and going through the find that the decision on the application unnecessarily delayed by the State which is also against the spirit behind Section 12 of the Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 2022. In the light of the above, we dispose of the instant petition with a direction to respondent No.3 to take a final decision on the 20.05.2025 for the grant of parole, within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, in accordance with law. Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-6877-2025 Date of decision : 02.07.2025 .…. Petitioner ..... Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL LAPITA BANERJI , Advocate, for the petitioner. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that she restricts prayer to the issuance of directions to respondent No.3-District Magistrate, to finally dispose of the application dated Jail Authorities, District Jail, Charkhi for grant of parole to the petitioner, as the same has been pending Learned State counsel has no objection to the acceptance of the afore After hearing learned counsel for the parties and going through the application for grant of parole has been unnecessarily delayed by the State which is also against the spirit behind Section 12 of the Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 2022. above, we dispose of the instant petition with a to take a final decision on the petitioner’s application for the grant of parole, within two weeks from the date of receipt (DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE 2025 5 he restricts District Magistrate, application dated Charkhi e has been pending Learned State counsel has no objection to the acceptance of the afore After hearing learned counsel for the parties and going through the for grant of parole has been unnecessarily delayed by the State which is also against the spirit behind Section 12 above, we dispose of the instant petition with a application for the grant of parole, within two weeks from the date of receipt VANDANA 2025.07.03 17:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document