Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
103 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-33659-2025 DECIDED ON: 04.07.2025 KEWAL KRISHAN
.....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA
.....RESPONDENT
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL. Present: Mr. Deepak Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Chetan Sharma, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Rakesh Nehra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ankit Yadav, Advocate for the complainant.
SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) The jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 BNSS, 2023, has been invoked seeking anticipatory bail to the petitioner in FIR No. 124, dated 23.02.2025, under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) of BNS, 2023, registered at Police Station Yamuna Nagar City.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition has been rendered infructuous, as the petitioner stands arrested in the afore-said FIR on 02.07.2025. Hence, the present petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
(SANDEEP MOUDGIL) 04.07.2025
JUDGE Sham Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SHAM SUNDER 2025.07.04 20:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document