VARUN DHAMA AND 10 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
A482/20735/2024 · 2025-09-15
Yogesh Dubey Joint Registrar Judicial
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 72002 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 72002 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 20735 of 2024 Court No. - 89 HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J.
1. The case is taken up on mentioning. 2. Supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of the applicants, is taken on record. 3. Heard Sri Ashish Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the applicants, Ms. Nandani Mishra, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 and Sri Manoj Gautam, learned AGA for the State-opposite party no.1. 4. This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred with prayer to quash the entire proceeding as well as charge sheet dated 13.09.2023, in Case No.831 of 2024 (State Vs. Varun Dhama and others), arising out of Case Crime No.275 of 2023, under sections 147, 148, 149, 188, 336, 323, 504, 506, IPC, Police Station Loni Border, District Ghaziabad, pending before learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Court No.10, Ghaziabad, on the basis of compromise. 5. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicants that applicants and opposite party no.2 have entered into compromise and the said compromise has already been verified by the learned court concerned and a report regarding verification of compromise sent by the court concerned is annexed at page nos.6 to 11 of the supplementary affidavit filed today. Learned counsel for the applicants further prays that in view of the compromise Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ashish Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Nandini Mishra Varun Dhama And 10 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)
entered into between the applicants and opposite party no.2, the proceeding of the aforesaid case be quashed. 6. On the other hand, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and learned AGA for the State have no objection to the above submissions made by learned counsel for the applicants. 7. In view of the fact that applicants and opposite party no.2 have entered into compromise and the said compromise has already been verified by the learned court concerned and a report regarding verification of compromise is already on the record and taking note of the law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Laxmi Narayan and others, AIR 2019 SC 1296 and the facts of the matter, it would be in the interest of justice that the impugned proceedings be quashed, in respect of the applicants. 8.
In view of the aforesaid, the entire proceeding as well as charge sheet dated 13.09.2023, in Case No.831 of 2024 (State Vs. Varun Dhama and others), arising out of Case Crime No.275 of 2023, under sections 147, 148, 149, 188, 336, 323, 504, 506, IPC, Police Station Loni Border, District Ghaziabad, pending before learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Court No.10, Ghaziabad, are hereby quashed. 9. The application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is hereby allowed. September 16, 2025 VKG A482 No. 20735 of 2024 2 (Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIJAY KUMAR GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad