Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2025 DAILYLAW 72001 (ORI)

PRADIP @ PRADIPTA KUMAR NAYAK v. STATE OF ODISHA

BLAPL/4557/2025 · 2025-10-14

Gourishankar Satapathy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK BLAPL No.4557 of 2025 Pradip @ Pradipta Kumar Nayak … Petitioner Mr. D. Nayak, Sr. Advocate Along with Mr. P. Nayak, Advocate -versus- State of Orissa … Opposite Party Mr. R.B. Mishra, Addl. PP Mr. A. Mishra, Advocate (informant) CORAM: JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY Order No. ORDER(ORAL) 14.10.2025 03. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical Mode). 2. This is a bail application U/S.483 of BNSS by the petitioner for grant of bail in connection with Rajkanika PS Case No.141 of 2025 corresponding to GR Case No.264 of 2025 pending in the file of learned JMFC, Aul, Kendrapara for commission of offences punishable U/Ss.105 of BNS, on the main allegation of committing culpable homicide not amounting to murder of the deceased. 3. Heard, Mr. Dharanidhar Nayak, learned Sr. counsel who is being assisted by Mr. Pratik Nayak, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr. Arijeet Mishra, learned counsel for the informant and Mr. R.B. Mishra, learned Additional Public Prosecutor in the matter and perused the record. 4. After having considered the rival submissions and taking into consideration the nature and gravity of the offences as alleged against the petitioner vis-à-vis the accusations sought to be brought against him and regard being had to the pre trial detention of the petitioner in custody since 27.03.2025 with submission of charge-sheet in the meantime and taking into account the circumstances under which the transaction took place and keeping in view the inherent right of the accused to be presumed innocent until proven guilty at the trial and taking into account the other circumstances on record in entirety, this Court notwithstanding to the serious objection as raised by the learned counsel for the informant, considers it proper to admits the petitioner to bail. 5. Hence, the bail application of the petitioner stands allowed and the petitioner is allowed to go on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) only with one solvent surety for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court in seisin of the case on such terms and conditions as deem fit and proper by it. 6. Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of. 7. Issue urgent certified copy of the order as per Rules. (G. Satapathy) Judge Jayakrushna