IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.131 Gram Panchayat Pichopa Khurd State of Haryana and others CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON'BLE M Present : Mr. Surender Lamba Mr. Ankur Mittal, Addl. A.G., Haryana. DEEPAK SIBAL, J 1. Through this petition, the primary grievance raised by the petitioner Gram Panchayat, Pichopa Khurd, District Charkhi Dadri is that inspite of passing of order dated 21.05.2025 for conducting demarcation of the land of the petitioner the encroachment account of political pressure. 2. Learned State counsel appearing on behalf of the State vehemently denies the assertion political influence being Pichopa Khurd and on instructions from Tehsildar, Badhra determine encroachme Pichopa Khurd within two weeks from today and that such demarcation would be after associating the petitioner demarcation report the petitioner-Gram Panch IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Gram Panchayat Pichopa Khurd Versus and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Surender Lamba, Advocate for the petitioner. Ankur Mittal, Addl. A.G., Haryana. * * * * * DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) Through this petition, the primary grievance raised by the petitioner Gram Panchayat, Pichopa Khurd, District Charkhi Dadri is that inspite of passing of order dated 21.05.2025 (Annexure P-9) by the Deputy Commissioner, Charkhi Dadri demarcation of the land of the petitioner the encroachments made on panchayat land, the nee account of political pressure. Learned State counsel appearing on behalf of the State vehemently assertion made by the petitioner-Gram Panchayat with regard to any political influence being exerted to avoid demarcation of Pichopa Khurd and on instructions from Tehsildar, Badhra determine encroachments, if any demarcation would be conducted in village Pichopa Khurd within two weeks from today and that such demarcation would be after associating the petitioner-Gram Panchayat as also that a copy of report shall be duly handed over to th Gram Panchayat. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-17708-2025 Date of decision : 09.07.2025 .…. Petitioner ..... Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL LAPITA BANERJI for the petitioner. Ankur Mittal, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Through this petition, the primary grievance raised by the petitioner- Gram Panchayat, Pichopa Khurd, District Charkhi Dadri is that inspite of passing of by the Deputy Commissioner, Charkhi Dadri demarcation of the land of the petitioner-Gram Panchayat to find out the needful is not being done on Learned State counsel appearing on behalf of the State vehemently Gram Panchayat with regard to any exerted to avoid demarcation of panchayat land in village Pichopa Khurd and on instructions from Tehsildar, Badhra he further submits that to demarcation would be conducted in village Pichopa Khurd within two weeks from today and that such demarcation would be Gram Panchayat as also that a copy of the shall be duly handed over to the authorized representative of PRINCE SAINI 2025.07.15 22:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-17708-2025 3. The afore statement made by the learned State counsel satisfies learned counsel for the petitioner 4. Disposed of. 09.07.2025 Prince Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 2025 The afore statement made by the learned State counsel satisfies learned counsel for the petitioner-Gram Panchayat. Disposed of. Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No : Yes / No - 2 - The afore statement made by the learned State counsel satisfies Gram Panchayat. [DEEPAK SIBAL] JUDGE [LAPITA BANERJI] JUDGE PRINCE SAINI 2025.07.15 22:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document