Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 71990 (KAR)

SRI MAHADEVA, v. PUTTAMMA

WP/20775/2025 · 2025-08-14

R Devdas

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31660 WP No. 20775 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 20775 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. MAHADEVA, S/O LATE ANKAIAH, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, 2. SRI. CHANNAPPA, S/O LATE ANKAIAH, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, BOTH PETITIONERS ARE RESIDING AT NO.620, AMBEDKAR BEEDHI, VAJAMANGALAGRAMA, VAJAMANGALA POST, VARUNA HOBLI, MYSURU TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT - 570 028. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. AKARSH KUMAR GOWDA, ADVOCATE) AND: PUTTAMMA (SINCE DECEASED) REPRESENTED BY HER LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES 1. SMT. SARASWATHAMMA, D/O LATE CHANNAIAH AND PUTTAMMA, MAJOR, R/AT NO.106, 4TH CROSS, 5TH MAIN, GANDHINAGARA, MYSURU - 570 007. Digitally signed by DHARMALINGAM Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31660 WP No. 20775 of 2025 2. SMT. MAHADEVAMMA, D/O LATE CHANNAIAH AND PUTTAMMA, MAJOR, R/AT HOSAKOTE GRAMA, CHIKKAIAHNA CHATRA HOBLI, AMBEDKAR BEEDHI, NANJANGUD TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT - 571 129. 3. SMT. MAHESHWARI, D/O LATE CHANNAIAH AND PUTTAMMA, MAJOR, R/AT KARUMBALLI VILLAGE, BEHIND MARIGUDI, SOSALE HOBLI, T. NARASIPURA TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT - 571 120. 4. SMT. ROOPASHRI, D/O LATE NAGARAJ, MAJOR, R/AT CHIKKANNAHALLI, SOSALE HOBLI, T. NARASIPURA TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT - 571 120. 5. SRI. MAHADEVA, S/O LATE NAGARAJ, MAJOR, R/AT VAJAMANGALA VILLAGE, VARUNA HOBIL, MYSURU TALUK AND DISTRICT - 570 028. 6. SRI.PRAMOD, S/O LATE NAGARAJ, MAJOR, R/AT VAJAMANGALA VILLAGE, VARUNA HOBLI, MYSURU TALUK AND DISTRICT - 5700 28. 7. SMT. RAJAMMA, D/O LATE CHANNAIAH, MAJOR, R/AT DOOR NO.304, 3RD CROSS, 4TH MAIN, GANDHINAGARA, MYSURU - 570 007. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31660 WP No. 20775 of 2025 8. SMT. KUMARI, D/O LATE CHANNAIAH, MAJOR, R/AT YAKANURU VILLAGE, HARIJANA BEEDHI, MUGURU HABLI, T. NARASIPURA TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT - 571 124. 9. SMT. SARASWATHI, W/O LATE SOMANNA, (D/O LATE CHANNAIAH AND PUTTAMMA), MAJOR, R/AT HARIJANA COLONY, MELLAHALLI, HAROHALLI, VARUNA HOBLI, MYSURU TALUK AND DISTRICT - 570 028. 10. SMT. RAJAMMA, D/O LATE SOMANNA, MAJOR, R/AT-VAJAMANGALA VILLAGE, VARUNA HOBLI, MYSURU TALUK AND DISTRICT - 570 028. 11. SRI. MAHENDRA, S/O LATE SOMANNA, MAJOR, R/AT VAJAMANGALA VILLAGE, VARUNA HOBLI, MYSURU TALUK AND DISTRICT - 570 028. 12. SRI. HARISH, S/O LATE SOMANNA, MAJOR, R/AT VAJAMANGALA VILLAGE, VARUNA HOBLI, MYSURU TALUK AND DISTRICT - 570 028. 13. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, MYSURU DISTRICT, MYSURU - 570 001. 14. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, MYSURU SUB-DIVISION, MYSURU - 570 001. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31660 WP No. 20775 of 2025 15. THE TAHSILDAR, MYSURU TALUK (MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA), MYSURU DISTRICT - 570 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MOHAMMED JAFFAR SHAH, AGA) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO EXERCISE ITS WRIT JURISDICTION UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION AND ISSUE A. A WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE ORDER DATED 29.04.2025 PASSED BY RESPONDENT NO.13- THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, MYSURU IN RP NO.207/2024 VIDE ANNEXURE - C AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate takes notice for respondents Nos.13 to 15. Notice to respondents Nos.1 to 12 is not necessary for the following reasons. 2. Learned Additional Government Advocate raises a preliminary objection that having regard to the - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31660 WP No. 20775 of 2025 amendment brought to Section 136(1) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964, w.e.f., 10.01.2025, the petitioners will have to approach the Karnataka Revenue Appellate Tribunal questioning the impugned order passed by the Deputy Commissioner under Section 136(3) of the Act. 3. Upholding the submissions made by the learned Additional Government Advocate, the writ petition stands dismissed while reserving liberty to the petitioners to approach the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal. 4. Learned Additional Government Advocate is permitted to file memo of appearance within a period of four weeks from today. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE rv List No.: 1 Sl No.: 31 CT: BHK