Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29197 WP No. 9311 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 9311 OF 2024 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:
1(a). MRS. AFSANA W/O LATE SYED ISMAIL @ BENDI BABU, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,
1(b). MR. SYED SAIF S/O LATE SYED ISMAIL @ BENDI BABU, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS,
1(c). MRS. SUZAINE BANU D/O LATE SYED ISMAIL @ BENDI BABU, AGED ABOUT 13 YEARS, REP. BY HER NATURAL GUARDIAN MOTHER MRS.AFSANA,
1(d). JAWERIA SUMAN D/O LATE SYED ISMAIL @ BENDI BABU, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS,
1(e). FIZA BANU D/O LATE SYED ISMAIL @ BENDI BABU, AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS,
1(f). AFIYATH ARBIYA D/O LATE SYED ISMAIL @ BENDI BABU, AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS,
ALL PROPOSED APPLICANTS ARE R/AT:
# 1064, 2ND STREET, ISLAMPURA, ANNASANDRAPALYA,
Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29197 WP No. 9311 of 2024
VIMANAPURA POST, HAL POST, BENGALURU-560 017. …PETITIONERS (BY SMT. SUMA.T., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. RAVIKUMARA.B.R., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. MR. FAIROZ KHAN S/O LATE AMEER JAN, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/AT NO 707, 1ST CROSS, ISLAMPUR HAL, BANGALORE-560 017. 2. MR. AFZAL KHAN S/O MR. MOHAMOOD KHAN, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/AT NO 43, 1ST CROSS, ISLAMPUR HAL, BANGALORE-560 017. 3. MRS. YASMEEN KHAN W/O MR. AFZAL KHAN, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/AT NO 43, 1ST CROSS, ISLAMPUR HAL, BANGALORE-560 017. 4. MR. BENDI BASHA S/O MR. SYED MAHBOOB, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/AT BEHIND SALVAGE LINE, OPP. TO SAYEED MANZIL, 1ST MAIN, 1ST CROSS, ANNASANDRAPALYA HAL, BANGALORE-560 017. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. - 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29197 WP No. 9311 of 2024
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER Smt.Suma.T., counsel on behalf of Sri.Ravikumara.B.R., for the petitioners has appeared in person and submits that short accommodation may be granted to comply with the office objections. This Court is not inclined to grant time. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed before Registrar (P & H) on several dates and time was granted to comply with the office objections.
Again the petition was listed before the Court and time was granted to comply with the office objections. The petition is listed today for orders regarding non- compliance of office objections. A perusal of the entire order sheet reveals that despite giving sufficient time, the office objections are not complied with. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 10