SAHZAD ALI ALIAS DILIP AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P.
BAIL/23592/2025 · 2025-07-23
Krishan Pahal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 71953 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 71953 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:121718 Court No. - 65 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 23592 of 2025 Applicant :- Sahzad Ali Alias Dilip And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Krishna Prakash,Ramesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
1. List has been revised. Supplementary affidavit filed today by the
learned counsel for the applicant is taken on record.
2. Heard Sri Ramesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicants as well as Sri Pranshu Kumar, learned AGA for the State and perused the material placed on record.
3. Applicants seek bail in Case Crime No. 01 of 2025, under Section 3(1) of U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station - Rajgarh, District - Mirzapur, during the pendency of trial.
4. It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicants that the prosecution under the Gangsters Act has been launched against the applicants on the basis of two criminal cases each shown in the gang chart in which they have already been enlarged on bail by the court concerned. Criminal history of one another case assigned to the applicant no.1 has been explained in the affidavit. The applicant no.2 has no other criminal history except the cases mentioned in the gang chart. They have been falsely implicated in the present case due to police rivalry. They are not the member of any gang. The applicants are not the previous convict. The applicants are languishing in jail since 03.05.2025 and in case, they are enlarged on bail, they will not misuse the liberty of bail.
5. Per contra, learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the bail prayer of the applicants.
6. Without expressing any opinion on the merits, the bail application is allowed. Let the applicants - Sahzad Ali @ Dilip and Seema Harijan, involved in aforesaid crime be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like
amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions that :-
1. The applicants shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.
2. The applicants shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.
3. The applicants shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.
7. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicants and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.
Order Date:- 24.7.2025 Siddhant (Justice Krishan Pahal) Digitally signed by :- SIDDHANT SAHU High Court of Judicature at Allahabad