[2025:RJ-JP:16084] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2299/2025 Sandeep Mulodiya S/o Roop Chand, R/o Torda Gujran, Tehsil Paota, District Kotputli-Behrod (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anoop Agarwal with Mr. Hoshiyar Singh Mr. Avinash Arya For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP with Mr. Shubham Sain, AAAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 15/04/2025 1. Apprehending his arrest in connection with FIR No.0029/2025 registered at Police Station Pragpura, District Kotputli-Behrod for the offence(s) under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 351(2), 352, 308(2) of BNS and Section 3/25 of the Arms Act, the petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 482 BNSS. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Name of the petitioner is not mentioned in the FIR. Petitioner is local resident and no custodial interrogation is required in this matter. He further submits that the petitioner is ready to co-operate with the investigation, therefore the bail application of the present petitioner may be allowed. [2025:RJ-JP:16084] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-2299/2025] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application of the present petitioner. 4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the fact that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the investigation of the case, without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it just and proper to allow the bail application of the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 482 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that in the event of arrest of the petitioner- Sandeep Mulodiya S/o Roop Chand, he shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Sunita/34