Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 71927 (ALL)

JAIPAL SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/21966/2025 · 2025-07-10

Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:111160 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 21966 of 2025 Petitioner :- Jaipal Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Prabhakar Awasthi,Sunil Kumar Kushwaha Counsel for Respondent :- Bhuvnesh Kumar Singh,C.S.C.,Vijay Kumar Dixit Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking following main prayers:- "Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the Assistant Registrar, Firms, Societies and Chits, Moradabad to re-determine the electoral college strictly in accordance with law and also as per the order dated 14.02.2020 passed in Writ-C No.13608 of 2015, Writ C No.3986 of 2016 and Writ-C No.53129 of 2014 and thereby may get an election held strictly in terms of Section 25(2) of the Societies Registration Act, 1860." 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, after arguing at some length, without entering into merits of the case, made an innocuous prayer that his objection dated 04.04.2025, which is pending before respondent no.2, Assistant Registrar, Firms, Societies and Chits, Moradabad, may be directed to be decided in time bound manner. 3. Sri V. K. Dixit, learned counsel for respondent no.2 and Sri B.K. Singh, learned counsel for respondent no.4 vehemently opposed the petition on merits, but has not opposed the innocuous prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. 4. Heard Prabhakar Awasthi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Sri V. K. Dixit, learned counsel for respondent no.2 and Sri B.K. Singh, learned counsel for respondent no.4 and perused the contents made in the writ petition and the documents on record. 5. Taking into consideration the submissions made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as no objection made on behalf of learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents, I am of the view that respondent no.2, Assistant Registrar, Firms, Societies and Chits, Moradabad is directed to decide the said objection dated 04.04.2025 (annexure-13 of the writ petition), which is pending before him, sympathetically in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order. 6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 11.7.2025 Asha (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ASHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ASHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ASHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ASHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ASHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad