Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7191 (JK)

JEHANGIR MUSHTAQ v. JALAL UD DIN BHAT AND ORS.

CR/19/2025 · 2025-05-06

Sanjay Dhar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

79 Suppl HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CR No. 19/2025 CM No. 2715/2025 Jehangir Mushtaq ….. Petitioner (s) Through: Mr. Mir Majid Bashir, Adv. V/s Jalal ud din Bhat and Ors. ….. Respondent(s) Through: Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar, Judge ORDER 06.05.2025 Confronted with the legal position that an order under Rule 9 of Order 22 of CPC refusing to set aside abatement or dismissal of the suit is appealable in nature in terms of order 43 Rule 1(k) of the Code of Civil Procedure, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this court to withdraw this revision petition with liberty to file appeal against impugned order passed by the learned trial court. In view of the above, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with leave and liberty as prayed for. Having regard to the fact that the petitioner has filed present petition under a bonafidee impression that the impugned order is revisable in nature, the learned trial court, shall take this fact into account, at the time of considering the application for condonation of delay which the petitioner may have to file along with the appeal against the impugned order. (Sanjay Dhar) Judge SRINAGAR 06.05.2025 Aasif