Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
79 Suppl
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
CR No. 19/2025 CM No. 2715/2025 Jehangir Mushtaq
….. Petitioner (s) Through: Mr. Mir Majid Bashir, Adv. V/s Jalal ud din Bhat and Ors.
….. Respondent(s)
Through:
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar, Judge
ORDER 06.05.2025
Confronted with the legal position that an order under Rule 9 of
Order 22 of CPC refusing to set aside abatement or dismissal of the suit is appealable in nature in terms of order 43 Rule 1(k) of the Code of Civil Procedure, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this court to withdraw this revision petition with liberty to file appeal against impugned order passed by the learned trial court.
In view of the above, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with leave and liberty as prayed for.
Having regard to the fact that the petitioner has filed present petition under a bonafidee impression that the impugned order is revisable in nature, the learned trial court, shall take this fact into account, at the time of considering the application for condonation of delay which the petitioner may have to file along with the appeal against the impugned
order. (Sanjay Dhar)
Judge
SRINAGAR 06.05.2025 Aasif