Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 71903 (MAD)

G.TENSINGH RAJENDRAN WESLEY v. STATE OF TAMIL NADU

WP/25677/2025 · 2025-07-15

C Kumarappan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.No.25677 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 15.07.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN W.P.No.25677 of 2025 G.Tensingh Rajendran Wesley ... Petitioner Vs. 1.State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary, School Education Department, Chennai – 600 002. 2.The Special Secretary, State of Tamil Nadu, Law Department, Chennai – 600 002. 3.The Director of Schools, DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai – 600 002. ... Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the representation dated 28.03.2025 sent by the petitioner to the respondents. For Petitioner : M/s.U.Parvatha Varthini For Respondents : Ms.S.Mythreye Chandru Special Government Pleader 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.25677 of 2025 O R D E R Ms.S.Mythreye Chandru, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice on behalf of the respondents. By consent, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself. 2.The instant writ petition has been filed seeking issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 28.03.2025. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has sent representation for regularization and for monetary benefit on 28.03.2025 and such representation is pending with the respondents. 4.The learned Special Government Pleader would strongly object the contention of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and would submit that the petitioner has already retired and hence claiming regularization and monetary benefit is contrary to law. 5.However, the petitioner's representation is pending consideration. In such view of the fact, without going into the merits 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.25677 of 2025 of the case, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the respondents to consider the above representation of the petitioner, upon its own merits and in accordance with law and pass orders, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6.The writ petition is disposed of. No costs. 15.07.2025 pri Index: Yes/ No Speaking Order: Yes/ No NCC: Yes/ No To 1.The Secretary, School Education Department, Chennai – 600 002. 2.The Special Secretary, State of Tamil Nadu, Law Department, Chennai – 600 002. 3.The Director of Schools, DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai – 600 002. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.25677 of 2025 C.KUMARAPPAN,J. pri W.P.No.25677 of 2025 15.07.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis