144. IN THE HIGH COURT Bikramjit Singh State of Punjab and CORAM: Present: NAMIT KUMAR 1. 09.12.2025 (Annexure P suspension. 2. Office of the Collector, Dharmapuri, 2019 (3) SCT 116 a punishment and no cause Court for impugning the suspension order. 3. restricts his claim in the present petition only for the subsistence allowance. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Bikramjit Singh Versus State of Punjab and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMI Mr. B.S. Bhatia, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Swapan Shorey, DAG, Punjab, with Mr. Swarn Singh, PFS, DFO, Ferozepur. ----- NAMIT KUMAR, J. (ORAL) The challenge in the present writ petition is to the order dated 9.12.2025 (Annexure P-8) whereby the petitioner has been placed under As has been held in B. Dharmaraj Versus District Collector Office of the Collector, Dharmapuri, 2019 (3) SCT 116 a punishment and no cause has accrued to the petitioner to approach this Court for impugning the suspension order. Faced with this situation, learned counsel for the petitioner restricts his claim in the present petition only for the subsistence allowance. OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-10280-2026 Date of decision: 06.04.2026 .... Petitioner .... Respondents HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Mr. B.S. Bhatia, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Swapan Shorey, DAG, Punjab, with Mr. Swarn Singh, PFS, DFO, Ferozepur. The challenge in the present writ petition is to the order dated 8) whereby the petitioner has been placed under B. Dharmaraj Versus District Collector Office of the Collector, Dharmapuri, 2019 (3) SCT 116, suspension is not to the petitioner to approach this Faced with this situation, learned counsel for the petitioner restricts his claim in the present petition only for the subsistence allowance. The challenge in the present writ petition is to the order dated 8) whereby the petitioner has been placed under B. Dharmaraj Versus District Collector , suspension is not to the petitioner to approach this Faced with this situation, learned counsel for the petitioner restricts his claim in the present petition only for the subsistence allowance. SANJEEV KUMAR 2026.04.07 16:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-10280-2026 - 2 - He submits that the petitioner has submitted representations dated 02.03.2026 and 24.03.2026, which are still pending consideration. 4. On receipt of advance copy of the petition, learned State counsel submits that the claim of the petitioner for subsistence allowance shall be considered and necessary order shall be passed, within a period of four weeks from today. 5. In view of the statement of learned State counsel, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition. 6. Disposed of as not pressed. (NAMIT KUMAR) JUDGE 06.04.2026 sanjeev Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No SANJEEV KUMAR 2026.04.07 16:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document