Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 71893 (PAT)

Satyam Kumar v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./63130/2025 · 2025-09-24

Chandra Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63130 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-97 Year-2025 Thana- Cyber P.S. District- Nawada ====================================================== Satyam Kumar S/o Ajay Kumar R/o Vill- Khapura, P.S.- Pakribarawan, Dist- Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shivendra Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Vinod Shanker Modi, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 24-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Nawada Cyber P.S. Case No. 97 of 2025 dated 26.06.2025 registered for the offences punishable u/ss 303(2), 318(2), 318(4), 319(2), 336(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2), 111, 317(5), 317(4) and 61(2) of the B.N.S. 3. As per the prosecution case, on the basis of information a raid was conducted by the informant alongwith other police personnel at the house of the co-accused (Bhusan Singh) and apprehended Satyam Kumar (petitioner) from one of the room of the house of the co-accused. It is further alleged that 3 mobile phones, one sim and three pages containing names and mobile numbers of various persons in which the account of Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63130 of 2025(2) dt.24-09-2025 2/3 money transactions and loan repayment period was written were recovered from the room of Satyam Kumar (petitioner). It is further alleged that on further inquiry, the petitioner disclosed that he commits cyber fraud by luring individuals with the promise of providing loans at concessional rates in the name of Bajaj Finance. Further, QR code, Aadhar Card, PAN Card, chats and screenshot of money transactions were found from the whatsapp and gallery of petitioner’s redmi mobile phone. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. It is submitted that the house does not belong to the petitioner and it was just a chance that at the time of raid, the petitioner was found there. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 27.06.2025. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner by submitting that the petitioner is involved in business of cyber crime. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner above- named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63130 of 2025(2) dt.24-09-2025 3/3 of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Nawada in connection with Cyber P.S. Case No. 97 of 2025, with the following conditions:- (i) The petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every date, failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the bail bonds of the petitioner are liable to be cancelled. (ii) If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature of offence in future, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of his bail bonds. 7. The application stands allowed. Raj Ranjan/- (Chandra Prakash Singh, J) U T