Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7189 (UTT)

HIMALAYA ORGANICS AGRO PVT. LTD v. CPMMISSIONER GARHWAL MANDAL

WPMS/1560/2025 · 2025-06-04

Ravindra Maithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS D1- 14 WPMS No.1560 of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Mr. V.B.S. Negi, Senior Advocate assisted by Ms. Prabha Naithani, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Suyash Pant, Standing Counsel for the State. The petitioner seeks directions to the respondents to remove the platform constructed for installation/construction of a statue adjacent to the boundary walls of the petitioner. It is the case of the petitioner that it has a residential premises in Dehradun. Alongside the residential premises of the petitioner, the respondents are erecting some platforms so as to install some statue. After arguing for a while, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has already submitted a representation to the respondent no.3/ The Chief Executive Officer, Dehradun, Smart City on 12.05.2025, which is part of Annexure No.3 to the writ petition, but it has yet not been decided. He seeks directions to the respondents to decide the representation submitted by the petitioner. Learned State Counsel would submit that the representation dated 12.05.2025, Annexure No. 3 to the writ petition, will be decided by the respondent no.3/ The Chief Executive Officer, Dehradun, Smart City, within a period of three weeks. The Court takes on record the statement given by learned State Counsel. The writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the respondent.3/ The Chief Executive Officer, Dehradun, Smart City, to decide the representation of the petitioner within a period of three weeks from today. (Ravindra Maithani J.) 04.06.2025 RV