IN THE 311 Kajal and another State of Haryana and others CORAM: Present : HARPREET SINGH BRAR of Constitution of India seeking mandamus, directing respondents No.2 and 3 to protect their life and liberty from the hands of private respondents No.4 and 5. Court, learned State counsel h have recorded the statements of petitioners, wherein they have stated that they do not assess any threat perception. The petitioners have recorded their complete satisfaction and they do not apprehend any t liberty at the hands of private respondents. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND AT CHANDIGARH Kajal and another VERSUS State of Haryana and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Mr.Gursimran Walia, Advocate and the petitioners. Mr. R.K. Ambavta, AAG, Haryana. **** HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (Oral) Present criminal writ petition has been filed under of Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus, directing respondents No.2 and 3 to protect their life and liberty from the hands of private respondents No.4 and 5. In compliance of the order dated 30.06.2025 passed by this Court, learned State counsel has filed the status report and states that police have recorded the statements of petitioners, wherein they have stated that they do not assess any threat perception. The petitioners have recorded their complete satisfaction and they do not apprehend any t liberty at the hands of private respondents. HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-6880-2025 Date of Decision : July 24, 2025 .....Petitioners VERSUS .....Respondent HARPREET SINGH BRAR Mr.Gursimran Walia, Advocate and Mr. Kartik, Advocate for Mr. R.K. Ambavta, AAG, Haryana. petition has been filed under Article 226 issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus, directing respondents No.2 and 3 to protect their life and liberty from the hands of private respondents No.4 and 5. In compliance of the order dated 30.06.2025 passed by this as filed the status report and states that police have recorded the statements of petitioners, wherein they have stated that they do not assess any threat perception. The petitioners have recorded their complete satisfaction and they do not apprehend any threat to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents. , 2025 Petitioners .....Respondents Mr. Kartik, Advocate for Article 226 issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus, directing respondents No.2 and 3 to protect their life and liberty In compliance of the order dated 30.06.2025 passed by this as filed the status report and states that police have recorded the statements of petitioners, wherein they have stated that they do not assess any threat perception. The petitioners have recorded their hreat to their life and PUNEET CHAWLA 2025.07.29 10:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document -2- In view of the status report filed by the State of Haryana, no further direction is required to be issued. The present petition stands disposed of accordingly. (HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE July 24, 2025 PC Whether speaking/reasoned. : Yes/No Whether Reportable. : Yes/No PUNEET CHAWLA 2025.07.29 10:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document