JEEVAN SINGH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRWP/6867/2025 · 2025-06-27
N S Shekhawat
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 71876 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 71876 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRWP-6867-2025 -1- 130
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-6867-2025 Date of Decision: 27.06.2025 JEEVAN SINGH AND ANOTHER
…PETITIONERS VS.
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS …RESPONDENTS
Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat Present : Mr. Ravi Kumar Mishra, Advocate with Ms. Deepika, Advocate for the petitioners.
***
N.S.Shekhawat J. (Oral)
1. The petitioners have filed the present petition with a prayer to direct the respondents No.1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners and also directing the respondents No.4 to 8 not to interfere in their lives and liberty.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have already submitted a representation dated 24.06.2025 (Annexure P-5) to the Senior Superintendent of Police, Faridkot and he shall be satisfied if directions are issued to respondent No.2 to look into their representation dated 24.06.2025 (Annexure P-5).
3. Notice of motion to respondents No.1 to 3 only, at this stage.
4. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Ravneet Singh Joshi, Deputy, A.G., Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3.
VIPIN KUMAR 2025.06.27 16:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this judgment/order
CRWP-6867-2025 -2-
5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
6. In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners and without expressing anything on the merits and claim of the parties, respondent No.2–The Senior Superintendent of Police, Faridkot, is
directed to depute a senior officer to look into the representation (Annexure P- 5) and after seeking a report, he may pass an appropriate orders, in accordance with law.
7. This order shall not be construed as an expression of opinion on the validity of the marriage of the parties. The parties mentioned in the petition or any other person mentioned in the petition shall be at liberty to take recourse to appropriate law, if any.
8. With these observations, this petition is disposed of 27.06.2025
(N.S. SHEKHAWAT) vipin
JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No VIPIN KUMAR 2025.06.27 16:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this judgment/order