Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7186 (RAJ)

RAHUL @ KALU S/O ACHAL SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/2306/2025 · 2025-03-05

Praveer Bhatnagar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:9627] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2306/2025 Rahul @ Kalu S/o Achal Singh, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Maghra, Police Station Ater, District Bhind (M.p.) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail Sewar, Bharatpur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2357/2025 Sukhveer S/o Gulab Singh, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Rajneetpura, Police Station Shamshabad, District Agra, Presently R/o Subedar Ka Pura, Police Station Rathore, District Agra, U.p. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Sewar, Bharatpur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Deepak Goutam, Mr. Rajeev Sogarwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.R. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 05/03/2025 1. These instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioners. The petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No.898/2023 registered at Police Station Bayana, District Bharatpur for the offence(s) under Sections 394, 302 and 34 of IPC and Section 3/25 of Arms Act. [2025:RJ-JP:9627] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-2306/2025] 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the other co-accused namely: Sangeeta and Akash Singh have already been enlarged on bail. The accused- petitioners are not involved in the alleged crime, therefore, these bail applications of the accused-petitioners may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail applications. 4. Heard and perused the charge-sheet. 5. Considering the fact that the police after thorough investigation arrested the accused-petitioners and at the instance of the accused-petitioner Rahul, one hand made pistol along with the cartridges were recovered. The police also concluded that the accused-petitioners along with the other co-accused were present at the place of occurrence and Rahul opened fire at deceased Sahil and thereafter, the accused-petitioners and the other co-accused fled away from the place of occurrence after committing robbery. Therefore, considering the above facts, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 6. Accordingly, these bail applications of the accused-petitioners are hereby, dismissed. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/21-22