Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 71854 (ALL)

MOHIT v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/23866/2025 · 2025-08-22

Ashutosh Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:145723 Court No. - 66 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 23866 of 2025 Applicant :- Mohit Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Shilpy Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Ashutosh Srivastava,J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed in the Court today is taken on record. 2. Heard Ms. Shilpy Sharma, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Purushottam Maurya, learned AGA for the State-respondents and perused the record. 3. This bail application under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been moved on behalf of accused- applicant, Mohit, seeking enlargement on bail in Case Crime No. 245 of 2024, under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 103(1), 351(2), 351(3), 333, 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Police Station- Bhawanpur, District- Meerut. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the accused- applicant is innocent. He has been falsely implicated in this very case crime number and is languishing in jail since 10.10.2024. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is not named in the FIR and applicant's name surfaced in the statement of the co-accused, Amit who has already been enlarged on bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 05.05.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 5274 of 2025. Learned counsel for the applicant further submits that the named accused persons, namely, Devendra, Veer Singh, Ravi @ Lakkar and Gaurav have also been granted bail by this Court (copy of the bail orders are annexed at Annexure-10 of the bail application) and applicant's case is on better footing than that of the co-accused persons. She next submits that the applicant has criminal antecedent of 13 cases and the same are duly explained in para 3 of the supplementary affidavit filed in support of the bail application and there is no likelihood of his fleeing from course of justice or tampering with evidence in case of release on bail. Hence, bail has been prayed for. 5. Learned AGA has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail. 6. Considering all above facts and circumstances, the nature of accusations, severity of the punishment in the case of conviction and nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tampering with the witness and prima facie case, but without commenting on merit of case, a case for bail is made out. 7. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 8. Let the accused-applicant, Mohit, involved in above mentioned case crime number be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each, in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence. 2. The applicant will not indulge in any criminal activity. 3. The applicant will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and co-operate in the trial. 4. The applicant will appear regularly on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his personal appearance is exempted through counsel by the court concerned. 9. In the event of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the court below will be at liberty to proceed to cancel his bail. Order Date :- 23.8.2025 Anjali Digitally signed by :- ANJALI SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad