Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 71852 (ALL)

SANJEEV KUMAR TIWARI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/9390/2025 · 2025-07-24

Manju Rani Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:122505 Court No. - 52 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9390 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sanjeev Kumar Tiwari Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Krishna Gopal Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rama Nand Pandey Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Rama Nand Pandey, learned counsel for respondent no. 3 and perused the record. 2. The instant petition has been filed on behalf of the petitioner with following prayers:- "a. issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the District Basic Education Officer, Jhansi, the respondent no.3 to decide the claim of the petitioner and grant trained grade pay from the date of initial appointment of the petitioner i.e. 09.07.1996 alongwith arrears of salary. b. issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the District Basic Education Officer, Jhansi, the respondent no.3 to decide the representation of petitioner dated 21.12.2024 which is still pending before him." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for ventilation of his grievances, the petitioner has approached the authority concerned by moving representations. However, despite several representations moved by the petitioner, no heed has yet been paid. 4. Learned counsel for respondent no. 3 submits that in case petitioner moves fresh application/representation before the competent authority, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case set up on behalf of the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of by providing that the petitioner may make fresh application/representation, ventilating all his grievances, supported by such documents, as may be advised, before the respondent no.3 within two weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order. On such representation being made, respondent no.3 shall make all endeavours to consider and decide the same, strictly in accordance with law, by means of a reasoned and speaking order, after giving proper opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment. Order Date :- 25.7.2025/Saurabh Digitally signed by :- SAURABH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad