- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33576 WP No. 12179 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 12179 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. THIMMAKKA W/O LATE ARASAIAH, AGED ABOUT 81 YEARS, 2. SRI. BYREGOWDA, S/O LATE ARASAIAH, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, 3. SRI. RAMAKRISHNA, S/O LATE ARASAIAH, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, 4. SRI. MUNIYAPPA, S/O LATE ARASAIAH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, 5. SRI. DUGLAIAH, S/O LATE ARASAIAH, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING AT KITTANAHALLI VILLAGE, DASANAPURA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU – 562 130. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. VIJAY BHONSLE, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by DHARMALINGAM Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33576 WP No. 12179 of 2025 AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU – 560 001. 2. THE TAHASILDAR BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU – 560 001 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MOHAMMED JAFFAR SHAH, AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT RESPONDENT NO.2 TO CONSIDER THE PETITIONER’S REPRESENTATION DATED 15.03.2024 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-G FOR THE TRANSFER OF KHATA IN RESPECT OF THE LAND BEARING SY. NO.80, MEASURING 9 ACRES, SITUATED AT GIDDENAHALLI VILLAGE, DASANAPURA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, IN THEIR NAMES, WITHIN A TIME FRAME. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned Counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo dated 30.07.2025 stating that in view of the subsequent development pursuant to the official memorandum issued by the respondent-authorities in respect of the petition schedule property, the petitioner is intending to prefer a - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33576 WP No. 12179 of 2025 comprehensive writ petition questioning the said official memorandum. Therefore, it is prayed that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file a fresh writ petition. 2. The memo is taken on record subject to all just exceptions. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. 4. Pending Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand disposed of. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE DL