COCP-1584 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 219 AU Small Finance Bank Ltd. Joginder Singh Lather and CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) 1. violation of order dated Division Bench of this Court and another disposed of with 2. State submits that P-1), peaceful possession of the back to the petitioner on dated 24.05.2025, as is evident from Possession 1584-2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP Date of Decision: AU Small Finance Bank Ltd. Versus Joginder Singh Lather and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Ms. Shruti Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner (through V.C.). Mr. V.K. Sachdeva, Advocate for respondents Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. A.G., Haryana for respondent No. 5. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The present contempt petition has been filed violation of order dated 27.05.2025 (Annexure P Division Bench of this Court in CWP-3409 and another vs. State of Punjab and others’ disposed of with the following observations: “4. Learned counsel for respondent No. 3 submits that the private respondent will not create any hindrance or obstacle to the peaceful possession of the asset but would seek recourse to the alternative remedy in accordance with law challenging the order passed by the District Magistrate.” At the very outset, learned counsel for the respondent submits that in compliance of the order dated 27.05.2025 (Annexure 1), peaceful possession of the secured asset back to the petitioner on dated 24.05.2025, as is evident from Possession IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-1584-2026 Date of Decision: 27.05.2026 .… Petitioner .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Ms. Shruti Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner (through V.C.). Mr. V.K. Sachdeva, Advocate for respondents No. 1 to 3. Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. A.G., Haryana The present contempt petition has been filed alleging (Annexure P-1) passed by the 3409-2019, titled as ‘Chanan Singh ’ whereby the writ petition was the following observations:- Learned counsel for respondent No. 3 submits that the private respondent will not create any hindrance or obstacle to the peaceful possession of the petitioner over the secured asset but would seek recourse to the alternative remedy in accordance with law challenging the order passed by the At the very outset, learned counsel for the respondent No. 5- in compliance of the order dated 27.05.2025 (Annexure secured assets have been handed over back to the petitioner on dated 24.05.2025, as is evident from Possession alleging the Chanan Singh whereby the writ petition was Learned counsel for respondent No. 3 submits that the private respondent will not create any hindrance or obstacle petitioner over the secured asset but would seek recourse to the alternative remedy in accordance with law challenging the order passed by the in compliance of the order dated 27.05.2025 (Annexure s have been handed over back to the petitioner on dated 24.05.2025, as is evident from Possession RISHU KATARIA 2026.05.29 16:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. COCP-1584 Report dated 24.05.2025 (Annexure R present petition. 3. 4. required to be passed in the present petition of, accordingly. 5. alternative remedy, if any, in accordance with law, if so advised. 6. 7. 27.05.2026 rishu 1584-2026 -2- Report dated 24.05.2025 (Annexure R-6). As such nothing su present petition. Heard. In view of the facts noted required to be passed in the present petition accordingly. The petitioner would be at liberty to take recourse to alternative remedy, if any, in accordance with law, if so advised. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. 27.05.2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable . As such nothing survives in the above, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition; and the same stands disposed The petitioner would be at liberty to take recourse to the alternative remedy, if any, in accordance with law, if so advised. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No rvives in the above, no further orders are disposed the RISHU KATARIA 2026.05.29 16:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.