IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.3800 of 2025 a/w connected matters Decided on: 6th May, 2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CWP No.3800 of 2025 Chandna Devi …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. CWP No.3802 of 2025 Manchana Devi …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3. CWP No.3804 of 2025 Nirupama …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4. CWP No.3806 of 2025 Briksha Devi …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5. CWP No.3808 of 2025 Dimple Kumari …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 6. CWP No.3814 of 2025 Seema Devi …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7. CWP No.3816 of 2025 Mahesh Lata …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Pankaj Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. L.N. Sharma and Mr. P.K. Nadda, Additional Advocates General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that due to developments that have taken place, more specifically the enactment, i.e. The Himachal Pradesh Recruitment and Conditions of Service of Government Employees Act, 2024, these writ petitions in the present form, cannot proceed ahead, therefore, the petitioners be permitted to withdraw the present writ petitions with liberty 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 3 to file afresh in accordance with law, inter alia, assailing the aforesaid enactment. 2. Prayer is accepted. Granting such liberty, the writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn alongwith pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua May 06, 2025 Judge Mukesh