1 2025:CGHC:6917 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1017 of 2025 1 - Smt. Meenakshi Sahu W/o Shri Ashok Kumar Sahu Aged About 39 Years R/o Plot No. C/6-C/8, Sector No. 30, P.S And Post- Rakhi, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Health And Family Welfare, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Police Station And Post-Rakhi, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, Distt. Raipur (Cg) 2 - Divisional Joint Director Office Of Divisional Joint Director, Department Of Health And Family Welfare, D.K.S. Bhawan Parisar, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G) 3 - Chief Medical And Health Officer (Cmho) Office Of Cmho, Kabirdham, District- Kabirdham (C.G) ... Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Abhishek Pandey with Ms. P.S. Nikita, Advocates For State/Respondent(s) : Ms. Nupur Trivedi, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Digitally signed by RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Date: 2025.02.17 19:27:58 +0530 2 Order on Board 06/02/2025 1. Heard Mr. Abhishek Pandey with Ms. P.S. Nikita, learned counsel petitioner as well as Ms. Nupur Trivedi, learned Panel Lawyer for State/respondents. 2. By way of this writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for following reliefs: “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records relating to the case of present petitioner. 10.2 That, the Hon'ble High Court may kindly be pleased to direct the Respondent No. 2, Divisional Joint Director, Raipur to decide the Appeal of petitioner which is pending since dated 28.10.2024 within the period of 30 days (Annexure P/3). 10.3. That this Hon'ble Court may further be pleased to direct the respondents to give suitable compensation to the petitioner for the mental trauma and agony, harassment and hardships suffered by them as also cost of the litigation.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed this petition with a prayer that the appeal filed before the appellate authority may be directed to be decided within some stipulated period to which the learned counsel for the respondent has not raised any objection. 3 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, further considering the limited prayer made by the petitioner for disposal of his appeal on some stipulated period and also considering this fact that petitioner has preferred this appeal on way back on 28.10.2024, the appellate authority i.e. respondent No.2 is directed to decide her appeal within 30 days from the date of production of copy of this order. 5. With this observation and direction, this petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Ravi Mandavi