MANJU JAKHATIA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRWP/6889/2025 · 2025-07-08
Sanjay Vashisth
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 71824 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 71824 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 116 CRWP-6889-2025 Decided on : 08.07.2025 Manju Jakhatia and another . . . Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others . . . Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH PRESENT: Mr. Vikkrant K. Vij, Advocate for the petitioner. **** SANJAY VASHISTH
, J. (Oral)
1. Present writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking issuance of directions to official respondents No. 2 and 3 to take action on the representation dated 23.06.2025(P-3) for protection of life and liberty of the petitioners.
2. On 01.07.2025, following order was passed:
“1. Present petition has been filed by the petitioners seeking direction to the official respondents to protect their life and liberty from the hands of private respondents.
2. It is observed that petitioner No.1 namely Manju Jakhatia, aged about 31 years, is already married to one Mithu Jakhatia, who has not been impleaded as a party in the present petition. From the said wedlock, petitioner No.1 has two children, a son aged approximately 11 years and a daughter aged about 9 years. Similarly, petitioner No.2 namely Sunil Kumar, aged about 34 years, is married to respondent No.4 namely Sheela, and the couple is blessed with three children, aged approximately 11 years, 9 years, and 7 years, respectively.
3. Neither counsel for the petitioner is present to assist this Court, nor the directly affected person, namely Mithu Jakhatia, has been impleaded as a party to the present petition.
4. In the interest of justice, the matter is adjourned to
08.07.2025. However, it shall be open to the petitioner to file an amended memo of parties in the Registry by impleading Mithu Jakhatia (husband of petitioner No.1), as party to the present petition.”
3. Today, at the very outset learned counsel for the petitioner prays RASHMI 2025.07.08 19:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRWP-6889-2025 - 2 - for withdrawal of the present petition.
4. Dismissed as withdrawn as prayed for.
(SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE July 08, 2025 rashmi Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No RASHMI 2025.07.08 19:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document