Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 71818 (PNJ)

SUNIL KUMAR DHIMAN v. UT OF CHANDIGARH

CRM-M/33469/2025 · 2025-08-28

Rajesh Bhardwaj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

357 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-33469-2025 Date of decision : 28.08.2025 Sunil Kumar Dhiman .....Petitioner versus U.T. of Chandigarh .....Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ Present :- Mr. Amandeep Singh Manaise, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rahil Mahajan, Addl. P.P., U.T. Chandigarh. RAJESH BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.41 dated 31.05.2025 under Section 140(3) of BNS, registered at Police Station North, District Chandigarh. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is not required in any FIR or complaint, at this stage. 3. Status report by way of affidavit of Mr. Uday Pal, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Central U.T. Chandigarh, has been filed on behalf of respondent-State and same is taken on recod. It has been contended by learned State counsel that if the petitioner is required for any investigation or enquiry, he will be issued with prior notice of 07 days. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner agreed to the statement made by counsel for the respondent-State. POOJA SHARMA 2025.08.29 10:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-33469-2025 -2- 5. In view of the statement made by learned State counsel, the present petition stands disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. ( RAJESH BHARDWAJ ) 28.08.2025 JUDGE ps-I Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No POOJA SHARMA 2025.08.29 10:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document