- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:45709 WP No. 4978 of 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 4978 OF 2015 (L-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI.M.MARKHENDAIAH SINCE DEAD BY LRS SMT. SHARADAMMA H E, W/O LATE MARKHENDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, 2. SRI JAGADISHA S/O LATE MARKHENDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS, 3. KUM. LIKHITHA D/O LATE MARKHENDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 16 YEARS, SINCE MINOR REPRESENTED BY NATURAL GUARDIAN HER MOTHER PETITIONER NO.1 ALL ARE RESIDING AT KADAKOLA VILLAGE, JAYAPURA HOBLI, MYSORE TALUK AND DISTRICT-57. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI.H.V.BHANU PRAKASH., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:45709 WP No. 4978 of 2015 AND: 1. M/S. BEST BILT BI-TECH LTD, FORMERLY KNOWN AS M/S GLOBAL GREEN COMPANY LIMITED, SPIRULINA FARM, INDUSTRIAL AREA, NANJANAGUD, MYSORE DISTRICT-571302 REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. 2. WELLISEN NUTRACEUTICALS PVT. LTD., NO.47, 60, 61(P) KIADB INDUSTRIAL AREA, NANJANGUD TALUK, MYSORE DISTRICT MYSORE - 571 302 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PRASHANTH.B.R., ADVOCATE FOR R1; R2 - SERVED & UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Though matter called twice, the petitioners are not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. Sri.Prashanth.B.R., counsel for respondent No.1 has appeared in person. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 28.10.2025, on that day, at request on behalf of - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:45709 WP No. 4978 of 2015 counsel for the petitioners, the matter was ordered to be listed on 11.11.2025. The petition is listed today. As could be seen from the Writ papers, the petition is filed in 2015. Now we are in November, 2025. The petition is pending from ten years. As already noted above, though matter called twice, the petitioners are not represented. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Because of dismissal of Writ Petition, pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of and interim direction if any stands discharged. Sd/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 41