Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 71798 (KAR)

SRI. NAGAPPA @ NAGAPPA THATTI, v. NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD.,

MFA/2600/2023 · 2025-07-12

Lok Adalath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF JULY 2025 CONCILIATORS PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A PATIL & SRI. M.N. UMASHANKAR, MEMBER M.F.A.No. 2600/2023 (MV) (Lok Adalat No. 5513/2025) BETWEEN 1 . SRI. NAGAPPA @ NAGAPPA THATTI, S/O LATE BASAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, 2 . SMT. AKKA MAHADEVI @ AKKAMMA W/O SRI. NAGAPPA @ NAGAPPA THATTI AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, 3 . SURESH S/O SRI. NAGAPPA @ NAGAPPA THATTI AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, 4 . HONNESH @ HONNAPPA S/O SRI. NAGAPPA @ NAGAPPA THATTI AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, 2 ALL ARE R/O YELBURTHI HIREBANNIGOL KOPPAL, KARNATAKA - 583 277. ...APPELLANTS (BY SRI GURUPRASAD B R, ADVOCATE) AND 1 . NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD., LOCAL OFFICE 4th FLOOR, FORTUNE BUILDING, OPP. TO ATHENA HOSPITAL FALNIR, MANGALURU 575 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER 2 . MR. MAHADEVA PRASAD S S/O SHIVALINGA M AGED AMAJOR, R/O D NO. 57, R K LAYOUT, KUPPALURU, JP NAGAR 3RD STAGE, MYSORE – 570008. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI A M VENKATESH, ADVOCATE FOR R-1) MFA FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 11.02.2022 PASSED IN MVC NO.380/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE MEMBER, MACT-III AND II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, D.K.MANGALURU, MANGALURU, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR 3 COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED: CONCILIATION ORDER The learned Counsel appearing for the Appellants - Claimants is present. The learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent – Insurance Company along with its representative are present. 2. After prolonged negotiations, the matter is settled. A joint memo signed by the learned advocate appearing for the appellants/claimants (being authorized by the appellants/claimants to sign) and the learned advocate appearing for the respondent - Insurance Company and its authorized officer is filed. The appellants-claimants have agreed to receive and the respondent - Insurance Company has agreed to pay a lump-sum of Rs.5,25,000/- (Rupees Five Lakh Twenty Five Thousand only) in addition to what has been awarded by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim. 3. The Respondent - Insurance Company has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within six weeks from the date of preparation of 4 award, failing which the said amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% P.A. from the date of default, till the date of deposit. 4. The apportionment, deposit and release of the enhanced compensation amount shall be made in terms of the Judgment and Award passed by the Claims Tribunal. 5. This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint memo. The Judgment and Award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER srk