Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 71785 (KAR)

SHRI B G PRAKASH KUMAR v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.RP/1102/2025 · 2025-08-13

Anant Ramanath Hegde

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31467 CRL.RP No. 1102 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 1102 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. SHRI B G PRAKASH KUMAR, S/O LATE B R GOPAL GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, RETIRED EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MALLESHWARAM DIVISION, WEST ZONE, BENGALURU R/AT NO.139, 10TH MAIN ROAD, BCC LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGAR, BENGALURU-560040. 2. SHRI. B.T. RAMESH, S/O LATE B H THAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, RETIRED CHIEF ENGINEER, OFFICE OF THE BBMP OFFICE, BENGALURU, R/AT NO.702, 7TH MAIN ROAD, 3RD BLOCK, 3RD STAGE, BASAVESHWARANAGAR, BENGALURU-560079. 3. SHRI M THYAGRAJ, S/O D M MUNIRAJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, RETIRED CHIEF ACCOUNTANT, OFFICE OF CHIEF ENIGNEER, BBMP WEST ZONE, BENGALURU. R/AT NO.62, 2ND MAIN ROAD, BINNY LAYOUT 3RD STAGE, ATTIGUPPE, VIJAYANAGAR 2ND STAGE, BENGALURU-560040. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI VIJAYA KUMAR.,ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by C HONNUR SAB Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31467 CRL.RP No. 1102 of 2025 AND: THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY CRIME INVESTIGATION DEPARTMENT (CID) 1, DR A KRISHNA RAO RD N, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, SAMPANGI RAMA NAGAR, BENGALURU-560001. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI B A BELLIAPPA, SPP-I WITH SRI CHANNAPPA ERAPPA, HCGP) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 CR.P.C (U/S 438 R/W 442 BNSS) PRAYING TO QUASH AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 09.04.2025 PASSED BY 78TH ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGLAURU, IN SPL.CC.NO.124/2021 QUA THE PETITIONERS HEREIN, VIDE ANNEXURE-A I THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there are incurable defects in the petition and he may be permitted to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh partition in accordance with law. 2. Memo is accepted. 3. Permission is granted to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a petition in accordance with law. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31467 CRL.RP No. 1102 of 2025 4. The time spent in prosecuting the petition from filing date, till this date is to be excluded in computing the limitation. Accordingly, Criminal Revision Petition is disposed of. Sd/- (ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE CHS List No.: 2 Sl No.: 0