Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 71777 (ALL)

YUVRAJ SINGH v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/26538/2025 · 2025-09-22

Ashutosh Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 26538 of 2025 Court No. - 66 HON'BLE ASHUTOSH SRIVASTAVA, J. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record. Heard Shri Onkar Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri S.K.Rai-learned AGA Ist, for the State and perused the record. The present bail application has been filed by the applicant Yuvraj Singh with a prayer to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No. 77 of 2025, under Sections-85, 80 (2), 103 (1), 238 BNS and 3/4 of D.P. Act, Police Station- Kotwali, Karwi, District-Chitrakoot, during pendency of trial. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent. He has been falsely implicated in the present case and is languishing in jail since 08.02.2025. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that First Information Report was lodged by the first informant with the allegation that the marriage of daughter of the first informant was solemnized with Anuj Patel in the year 2024. He further submits that First Information report has been lodged on 07.02.2025 with the allegation that on the date of incident all the accused persons killed his daughter by setting her ablaze. In the post mortem report the cause of death has been mentioned as Throttling and Post Mortem burn. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that in the First Information Report general allegations have been levelled against all the accused persons. He further submits that the applicant is brother in law of the deceased, he is living separately and he has nothing to do with the deceased or her husband. No any role has been assigned to the applicant. Co-accused Nandkishor Patel and Rekha Devi have been granted bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court in Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos. 29369 of 2025 and 24286 of 2025, vide orders dated 26.08.2025 and 02.09.2025. Criminal history of one case has been explained in paragraph no. 2 of the supplementary affidavit and there is no likelihood of her fleeing from course of justice or tampering with evidence in case of release on bail. Hence, bail has been prayed for. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Onkar Singh, Rajiv Dwivedi, Sachin Malik Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Yuvraj Singh .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Per contra, learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the bail prayer of the applicant but could not dispute the aforesaid facts. Considering the nature of the offence, material/evidence brought on record, complicity of the accused, severity of punishment, the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed. Let the applicant-Yuvraj Singh, involved in aforesaid case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two local sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions:- 1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence. 2. The applicant will not indulge in any criminal activity. 3. The applicant will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and co-operate in the trial. 4. The applicant will appear regularly on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his personal appearance is exempted through counsel by the court concerned. In the event of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the court below will be at liberty to proceed to cancel his bail. September 23, 2025 Deepak/ BAIL No. 26538 of 2025 2 (Ashutosh Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- DEEPAK KUMAR KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad