IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL REVISION No.43 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-0 Thana- District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1. Kamaludin Ansari Son Of Samasudin Ansari Resident Of Village - Kaua Khoch, Police Station - Kargahar, District - Rohtas. 2. Jamalluddin Ansari Son Of Samasudin Ansari Resident Of Village - Kaua Khoch, Police Station - Kargahar, District - Rohtas. 3. Rasmudin Ansari @ Jasamuddin Ansari Son Of Mahadin Ansari Resident Of Village - Kaua Khoch, Police Station - Kargahar, District - Rohtas. 4. Ebrahim Ansari Son Of Not Known Resident Of Village - Kaua Khoch, Police Station - Kargahar, District - Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Jan Md. Ansari Son Of Marhum Wajir Ansari Resident Of Village - Kaua Khoch, Police Station - Kargahar, District - Rohtas. 3. Nasarat Ansari Son Of Marhum Navirsul Ansari Resident Of Village - Kaua Khoch, Police Station - Kargahar, District - Rohtas. 4. Kamuludin Ansari Son Of Marhum Navirasul Ansari Resident Of Village - Kaua Khoch, Police Station - Kargahar, District - Rohtas. 5. Kamyadin Ansari Son Of Marhum Navirasul Ansari Resident Of Village - Kaua Khoch, Police Station - Kargahar, District - Rohtas. 6. Anwar Ansari Son Of Marhum Kurwan Ansari Resident Of Village - Kaua Khoch, Police Station - Kargahar, District - Rohtas. 7. Manauwar Ansari Son Of Marhum Kurwan Ansari Resident Of Village - Kaua Khoch, Police Station - Kargahar, District - Rohtas. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the State : Mr .Anuj Kumar Shrivastava, APP For the Respondents : Mr. Jitendra Prasad Singh, Sr. Advocate Mr. Rajeev Kumar, Advocate Mrs. Sripriya Sinha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 4 07-07-2025 Nobody is present on behalf of the petitioners. 2. It transpires that despite last opportunity given to Patna High Court CR. REV. No.43 of 2022(4) dt.07-07-2025 2/2 the petitioners to remove the defect(s) as pointed out by the office, the petitioners have not preferred to remove the same which shows that the petitioners are not interested to prosecute the present petition. 3. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. shoaib/- (Jitendra Kumar, J) U T