ANIL SINGH ALIAS ANIL KUMAR SINGH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./1451/2025 · 2025-05-07
Sri Ananda Sen
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7177 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7177 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:13731
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.1451 of 2025 ------ Anil Singh @ Anil Kumar Singh, son of Bireshwar Singh, resident of village Tangertoli, PO Lasia, PS Kolebira, District Simdega … … Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand. … … Opposite Party(s) ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Prabir Kr. Chatterjee, A.P.P. ----- 03/ 07.05.2025 Heard the parties.
2. This anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, has been preferred by the petitioner apprehending his arrest for offences registered under Sections 317(5) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, section 4/21 of MMDR Act and section 9 and 11 of Jharkhand Mineral Prohibition of Illegal Mining Transportation and Storage Rule in connection with Kolebira PS Case No. 73 of 2024 pending in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Simdega.
3. Learned A.P.P. representing the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.
4. The allegation against this petitioner is that even after lapse of lease the petitioner continued mining of stone. This definitely is illegal mining which is done by the petitioner.
5. Considering the nature of the allegation, I am not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to this petitioner.
6. Accordingly, this Anticipatory Bail Application stands dismissed.
(ANANDA SEN, J.) Tanuj/Cp-3