GURDARSHAN SINGH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRWP/6794/2025 · 2025-07-31
Jasjit Singh Bedi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 71766 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 71766 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRWP-6794-2025 #1#
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CRWP-6794-2025 Date of Decision:-31.07.2025 Gurdarshan Singh & Anr. ......Petitioners. Vs. State of Punjab. ......Respondent.
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present:- Mr. Abnash Singh, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. Harkanwar Jeet Singh, AAG Punjab. Mr. Dhiraj Chawla, Advocate for respondent nos.6 & 7. *** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J.(ORAL) The Prayer in this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is for issuance of direction to the official respondents to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners which is under threat at the hands of the official of respondent nos.3 & 5 who are in connivance with private respondent nos.6 & 7. The Counsel for the petitioners contend that the respondent no.3 is threatening the petitioners with false implication in a case, if they do not vacate or hand over the possession of the showroom to the private respondents. He thus contends that appropriate directions be issued to ensure the protection of the petitioners. The Counsel for the State has filed status report by way of affidavit of Mr. Jaspinder Singh, PPS, Superintendent of Police, Sub VINAY MAHAJAN 2025.08.01 09:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRWP-6794-2025 #2#
Division Zirakpur, District SAS Nagar, Mohali, which is taken on record. He along with the counsel for respondent nos.6 & 7 contend that on an inquiry being conducted it was found to be a dispute of civil nature between a landlord and tenant. The statements of the parties were also recorded and nothing has come forth which could substantiate the allegations of the petitioner levelled in his representation dated 23.06.2025 (Annexure P-4). I have heard Counsel for the parties. In view of the aforesaid status report filed today, no further orders are required to be passed by this Court.
Disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to avail his remedies in accordance with law.
( JASJIT SINGH BEDI ) JUDGE July 31, 2025 Vinay Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No VINAY MAHAJAN 2025.08.01 09:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document