- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31975 WP No. 17467 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 17467 OF 2024 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT B. MANJULA W/O M. RAGHAVA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/AT NO.1584, 27TH MAIN ROAD, 2ND SECTOR, HSR LAYOUT, BENGALURU-560102. 2. SMT. B. SHOBHA, W/O LATE. B.SRINIVAS, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/AT #558, 23RD B MAIN, 19TH CROSS, BEHIND PARAGIPALYA BUS STOP, HSR SECTOR-2, BENGALURU-560102. 3. SRI. B. SENALATHA REDDY, W/O V.RAJENDRA BABU, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/AT NO.2416, 25TH A CROSS, HSR LAYOUT, BENGALURU - 560102. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. RAMESHA M N., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. ROOPA W/O LATE. SRI. RAMESH BABU, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31975 WP No. 17467 of 2024 2. SRI. SHREYAS BALAREDDY, S/O LATE. SRI. RAMESH BABU, AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS BOTH ARE RESIDING AT 1092, 8TH CROSS, 19TH MAIN, SECTOR NO.1, HSR LAYOUT, BENGALURU - 560102. 3. SRI. N. VENKATESH REDDY, S/O SRI. K.G. NARASIMHA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/AT NO.689, 12TH CROSS, 26TH MAIN, SECTOR NO.1, HSR LAYOUT, BENGALURU-102. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PRADEEP NAIK K., ADVOCATE FOR CAV./R1) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNX-A THE ORDER DTD 04.12.2024 PASSED ON IA NO.12 FILED UNDER ORDER 22 RULE 2 OF CPC, IA NO.13 FILED UNDER ORDER 22 RULE 9 OF CPC, IA NO.14 FILED UNDER SECTION 5 OF LIMITATION IN OS.NO.07/2021 PASSED BY THE CITY CIVIL JUDGE (CCH-26) AT BENGALURU BY THE ISSUE OF WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT OR ORDER OR DIRECTION AND CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW THE IA.NO.12 TO 14 OF APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONERS/APPLICANTS AS ANNX-E TO F BY WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR ORDER OR DIRECTION AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31975 WP No. 17467 of 2024 ORAL ORDER The petitioner is before this Court calling in question the order which rejects the application under Order XXII Rule 2 and directed to drawing up of a decree accordingly. 2. In the light, the subject petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India would not be maintainable in view of the remedy of filing of appeal is available. 3. In that light, petition stands disposed reserving liberty to call in question the order which rejects the application under Order XXII Rule 2 of Code of Civil Procedure in an appropriately drawing an appeal. 4. Ordered accordingly. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE SSD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 262