- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43438 CA NO. 68 OF 2017 IN COP NO.256 OF 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 68 OF 2017 IN COMPANY PETITION NO. 256 OF 2012 BETWEEN: OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR OF M/S. BELLARY STEELS AND ALLOYS LIMITED (IN LIQN.) ATTACHED TO HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, "CORPORATE BHAVAN", NO.26-27, 12TH FLOOR, RAHEJA TOWERS, M.G.ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001. …APPLICANT (BY SRI. K.S.MAHADEVAN, ADVOCATE FOR OL) AND: 1. SHRI. S.MADHAVA, NO.48, 2ND CROSS, PARVATHI NAGAR, BELLARY, KARNATAKA-583 101. 2. SMT. PARVATHI S.MADHAVA SRI. RAMESHWARI, NO.48, 2ND CROSS, PARVATHI NAGAR, BELLARY, KARNATAKA-583 103. 3. SRI. KOTIKANYADANAM TATACHAR NARASIMHA GOPAL, S/O. NARASIMHA KOTIKANYADANAM TATACHAR, #S 2, SAPTHASWARA APARTMENTS, NO.28, 8TH CROSS, 5TH MAIN, Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43438 CA NO. 68 OF 2017 IN COP NO.256 OF 2012 MALLESHWARAM, BENGALURU-560 003. 4. SRI. S.HARIKRISHNA, S/O. S.MADHAVA, NO.4000, SRI. LAKSHMI, HAL 2ND STAGE, 100 FEET ROAD, INDIRANAGAR, BENGALURU-560 008. 5. SRI. S.BHANU PRAKASH, S/O. SINGANAMALA MADHAVA, SOBHA ALTHEA APARTMENT, BLK 1, #A2-1071, 7TH FLOOR, HAROHALLI, YELAHANKA, BENGALURU-560 064. 6. SRI. S.SIVARAM PRASAD, S/O. S.NAGAPPA, SRI. RAMESHWARI, NO.48/18 WARD, 2ND CROSS, PARVATHI NAGAR, BELLARY, KARNATAKA - 583 103. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. JYOTHI.S, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. M.VINAYAKEERTHY, ADVOCATE FOR R2, R4 AND R6; SRI. R.RAMESH, ADVOCATE FOR R3; SRI. A.RAGHUPATHI, ADVOCATE FOR R5; R1 - SERVED) THIS COMPANY APPLICATION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 454 (5) AND (5A) OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 READ WITH RULES 132 OF THE COMPANIES (COURT) RULES, 1959. THIS COMPANY APPLICATION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43438 CA NO. 68 OF 2017 IN COP NO.256 OF 2012 ORAL ORDER Sri.K.S.Mahadevan., for the Official Liquidator and Smt.Jyothi.S., counsel on behalf of Sri.M.Vinayakeerthy., for respondents 2, 4 and 6 have appeared in person. Counsel Sri.K.S.Mahadevan., submits that company application may be dismissed as having become infructuous. When queried, counsel submits that a conscious decision is taken about infructuous of the application. The oral submission made by counsel for the official liquidator is placed on record. Accordingly, the Company Application is dismissed as having become infructuous. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE KMV,TKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4