201-3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-40344-2022(O&M) Date of decision: 23.07.2025 HOSHIAR SINGH AND ANR. ...PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR. ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present: Mr.Amitoj Singh Dhaliwal, Advocate for peoner No.1. Mr. Simrandeep Singh Sandhu, Advocate for peoner No.2. Mr. Jasdev Singh Thind, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Mansur Ali, Advocate and Mr. Amanpreet Kooner, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (ORAL) FIR No. Dated Police Staon Secons 053 23.04.2021 Balongi, SAS Nagar (Mohali) 406/420/120-B 1. The peoners, arraigned as accused in the above caponed FIR, have come up before this Court under Secon 482 CrPC for quashing of the FIR and all consequenal proceedings based on the compromise with the aggrieved person. 2. Counsel for peoner No.1 submits that peoner No.1 never filed this peon. 3. Counsel for the vicm submits that the compromise was not entered into, as such, they are opposing the quashing based on compromise. 4. Since, the vicm/complainant is opposing the peon based on compromised, as such, present peon is not maintainable. 5. Given above, the peon is dismissed. However, liberty is reserved to the peoners to file a fresh peon a;er entering into compromise or on merits. As peon dismissed, so there is no need to discuss the point whether peoner No.1 file the present peon or not. All the pending applicaon(s), if any, stand disposed of. 23.07.2025 (ANOOP CHITKARA) renubala JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No Renu Bala 2025.08.02 14:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document