Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 71742 (ALL)

UDAY RAJ SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

WRIA/9025/2025 · 2025-07-08

Ajit Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:108271 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9025 of 2025 Petitioner :- Uday Raj Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anand Mani Tripathi,Satya Prakash Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, petitioner has prayed for following relief as substantial relief: "i) a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing to the respondent authorities i.e. Respondent No. 4 & 5 i.e. Chief Account Officer, U.P. Police Head Quarters, Lucknow & Superintendent of Police, Gorakhpur to pay the Gratuity Payment Order (G.P.O.) & Commutation payment Order (C.P.O.) of Rs. 12,23,200/- with interest and also pay the regular pension of the petitioner." It appears from the records that the petitioner has already represented the matter to the respondent no. 5 on 23.04.2025. Learned Standing Counsel submits that he has no objection in the event this petition stands disposed of with a direction to the respondent no. 5 to look into and consider the grievance of the petitioner and pass appropriate order strictly in accordance with law. In view of the above, this petition stands disposed of with a direction that respondent no. 5 shall consider the grievance of the petitioner raised in his representation and decide the same within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Needless to add the order to be passed by the competent authority, as directed herein above, shall be reasoned and speaking one. Order Date :- 9.7.2025 IrfanUddin Digitally signed by :- IRFAN UDDIN SIDDIKI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad