Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 71724 (KAR)

N ASHWINI v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

WP/32576/2024 · 2025-10-16

S Sunil Dutt Yadav

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41179 WP No. 32576 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 32576 OF 2024 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. N ASHWINI W/O M N DEVARAJA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS 2. M N DEVARAJA S/O M K NINGAYYA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS BOTH RESIDING AT NO. 1356 14TH MAIN ROAD, 15TH CROSS KUMARASWAMY LAYOUT BENGALURU - 560078 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. RAJESH B L., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT KANDAYA BHAVAN, KG ROAD BENGALURU - 560009. 2. TAHSILDAR BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK KANDAYA BHAVAN, K G ROAD BENGALURU - 560 009. 3. K B KRISHNAMURTHY S/O LATE BALAKRISHNAPPA Digitally signed by HEMALATHA A Location: HIGH COURTOF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41179 WP No. 32576 of 2024 AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS 4. YASHODHA W/O K B KRISHNAMURTHY AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS BOTH 3 AND 4 ARE RESIDING AT NO.53, NAGU NILAYA B J NAGARA, MALLATHAHALLI BENGALURU – 560053 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.SHAMANTH NAIK., HCGP FOR R-1 & R-2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER BEARING NO. 642059 DATED 17/05/2024 PASSED BY THE R1, PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-A. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV ORAL ORDER AGA accepts notice for respondent Nos.1 and 2. 2. Counsel for the petitioners submits that the order of conversion is passed circumventing the direction in WP 16286/2022. 3. AGA submits, as against the order at Annexure-A, an appeal lies to the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal under Section 49 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41179 WP No. 32576 of 2024 4. In light of the same, petitioners are relegated to avail of the appellate remedy as is prescribed in law as against the order impugned at Annexure-A. All contentions kept open. Time spent before this Court may be taken note of, in the event of any objection raised regarding limitation. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE CM LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 31