Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7172 (RAJ)

DHANRAJ S/O NARAYAN LAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLW/231/2025 · 2025-03-05

Inderjeet Singh, Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:9717-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Criminal Writ Petition (Parole) No. 231/2025 Dhanraj S/o Narayan Lal, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Village Sirsod Kala, Police Station Kelwada, District Baran (Presently Confined In Open Air Sanganer, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Home, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. The Prisoners Parole Advisory Commitee (State Committee), Through Its Chairman, Director General Of Prisons, Rajasthan. 3. Deputy Inspector General Of Prison, Jaipur Rajasthan. 4. Superintendent Central Jail, Jaipur. 5. Superintendent (In Charge), Open Air Camp Saganer, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dheeraj Sihghal, Advocate. Ms. Bhawna Ladha, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, Additional Government Advocate. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 05/03/2025 This D.B. Criminal Writ Petition (Parole) has been filed by the petitioner with a limited prayer seeking waiver of the condition of one surety of Rs.50,000/- out of the conditions viz. ‘personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of the like amount’ as imposed by authority concerned vide order dated 20.11.2024 for releasing the petitioner on parole. [2025:RJ-JP:9717-DB] (2 of 2) [CRLW-231/2025] Counsel for the petitioner submits that the financial condition of the petitioner is very poor and he is not in a position to furnish one surety of Rs.50,000/-, and therefore, prayed for waiving of condition of one surety of Rs.50,000/-. Learned Additional Government Advocate opposed the writ petition (parole). We have perused the order dated 20.11.2024 passed by the authority concerned. From perusal of the order dated 20.11.2024 passed by the authority concerned, it is revealed that the petitioner was granted parole subject to furnishing of personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of like amount. Considering the limited prayer made by the petitioner and present facts and circumstances of the case, we dispose of this D. B. Criminal Writ Petition (Parole) modifying the impugned order dated 20.11.2024 passed by the authority concerned qua the petitioner to the extent that the petitioner be released on parole upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and one surety of like amount instead of two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each i.e. the condition of submitting one surety of Rs.50,000/- is waived of. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J Tushar/41