Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 71717 (ALL)

SONAM v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

CRLP/14255/2025 · 2025-10-12

Lakshmi Kant Shukla, Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 14255 of 2025 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE LAKSHMI KANT SHUKLA, J. 1. The instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution has been preferred by the petitioner seeking a direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent authorities to conduct fair investigation in Case Crime No. 0076 of 2025, under Section 110, 115(2), 118(1), 352, 351(2), 75 B.N.S., Police Station Hastinapur, District Meerut. 2. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Ashish Tyagi, Advocate appearing on behalf of respondent nos. 4 and 5 and Mr. Rizwan Ahmad, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State and perused the material available on record. 3. After some length of arguments, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State apprised the Court that the investigation has been completed and after completion of the investigation a charge-sheet has also been submitted in Court on 29.08.2025 against respondent nos. 4 and 5. 4. At this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted and prayed that the instant writ petition may be disposed of in the light of the statement given by the learned A.G.A. with liberty to the petitioner to avail other remedy available to her under the law. 5. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the parties and the fact that investigation has already been completed and a charge-sheet has also been filed, we do not find any good reason to keep this matter pending for further adjudication. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manoj Kumar Dubey Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ashish Tyagi, Kapil Tyagi, G.A. Sonam .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) 6. Accordingly, in view of the above, the instant writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail such other remedy available to her under the law, as advised. October 13, 2025 Brijesh Maurya CRLP No. 14255 of 2025 2 (Lakshmi Kant Shukla,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- BRIJESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad