COCP-2308 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 103 Prem Singh (now deceased) through his LRs and another Shri Mahavir Singh and another CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) 1. dated 12.12.2007 ‘Om Parkash and others connected petitions including others vs. whereby the respondents were directed as under: 2. directions of the Writ Court reproduced above stands duly complied with 2308-2023 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP Date of Decision: Prem Singh (now deceased) through his LRs and another Versus Shri Mahavir Singh and another CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA None for the petitioners. Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. A.G., Haryana. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been filed alleging violation of order 12.12.2007 (Annexure P-1) passed in Om Parkash and others vs. State of Haryana and others connected petitions including CWP-5328-1990 vs. State of Haryana and others’ filed by the present petitioners, whereby the respondents were directed as under: “It is a conceded position that Physical Training Instructors (NFC) later challenged order dated 30.03.1994 as referred to above in C.W.P. No. 5816 of 1984, that writ petition was allowed. Order was set aside and the P.T.Is (NFC) and DPE (NFC) were held entitled to the payment of higher pay scale. That being so of the ratio of the judgment in the petitioners are also entitled to get the higher pay scales as has been granted in favour of the P.T.I(NFC) by the Court in C.W.P. No. 5816 of 1994 titled as National Fitness Corporation Teachers Association v. State of Harya others, decided on 10.10.2007. This writ petition stands allowed in the above terms.” Learned counsel for the respondents submits that directions of the Writ Court reproduced above stands duly complied with IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP 2308-2023 (O&M) Date of Decision: 25.09.2025 Prem Singh (now deceased) through his LRs and another .… Petitioners .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. A.G., Haryana. The present petition has been filed alleging violation of order 1) passed in CWP-2071-1986 titled as State of Haryana and others’ and other 1990 titled as ‘Surjit Singh and filed by the present petitioners, whereby the respondents were directed as under:- “It is a conceded position that Physical Training Instructors (NFC) later challenged order dated 30.03.1994 to above in C.W.P. No. 5816 of 1984, that writ petition was allowed. Order was set aside and the P.T.Is (NFC) and DPE (NFC) were held entitled to the payment of higher pay scale. That being so, this Court feels that in view of the judgment in Ram Kishan Ahlawat (supra, the petitioners are also entitled to get the higher pay scales as has been granted in favour of the P.T.I(NFC) by the Court in C.W.P. No. 5816 of 1994 titled as National Fitness Corporation Teachers Association v. State of Haryana & others, decided on 10.10.2007. This writ petition stands allowed in the above terms.” Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the directions of the Writ Court reproduced above stands duly complied with The present petition has been filed alleging violation of order 1986 titled as and other and filed by the present petitioners, “It is a conceded position that Physical Training Instructors (NFC) later challenged order dated 30.03.1994 to above in C.W.P. No. 5816 of 1984, that writ petition was allowed. Order was set aside and the P.T.Is (NFC) and DPE (NFC) were held entitled to the payment of , this Court feels that in view Ram Kishan Ahlawat (supra, the petitioners are also entitled to get the higher pay scales as has been granted in favour of the P.T.I(NFC) by the Court in C.W.P. No. 5816 of 1994 titled as National Fitness na & the directions of the Writ Court reproduced above stands duly complied with RISHU KATARIA 2025.09.26 11:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. COCP-2308 as, the revised dated 25.08.2025 petitioner vide order dated namely, Prem Singh and Raja Ram, been sent by the respondents Haryana on dated counsel for the respondent present petition. 3. statements of both the petitioners reflecting the payments released into their accounts handed over in Court by learned counsel for the petitioners are taken on record. 4. representation on behalf of the 5. 6. required to be passed; and the present petition is hereby accordingly. 7. 8. 25.09.2025 rishu 2308-2023 (O&M) -2- revised pay scale has been granted to the petitioners 25.08.2025, in pursuance to which the benefits were released to the petitioner vide order dated 22.08.2025; and case of namely, Prem Singh and Raja Ram, for revision of th been sent by the respondents to the Principal, Accountant General, Haryana on dated 29.08.2025 and 29.08.2027 counsel for the respondents thus, submits that nothing survives in the present petition. Copies of the aforesaid orders along with copies of account statements of both the petitioners reflecting the payments released into their accounts handed over in Court by learned counsel for the petitioners are taken on record. Even in the second round of representation on behalf of the petitioner. Heard. In view of the facts noted above, no further direct required to be passed; and the present petition is hereby accordingly. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. .09.2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable pay scale has been granted to the petitioners vide order , in pursuance to which the benefits were released to the ; and case of both the petitioners, for revision of their pension have also to the Principal, Accountant General, 29.08.2025 and 29.08.2027, respectively. Learned thus, submits that nothing survives in the f the aforesaid orders along with copies of account statements of both the petitioners reflecting the payments released into their accounts handed over in Court by learned counsel for the petitioners Even in the second round of hearing, there is no In view of the facts noted above, no further direction is required to be passed; and the present petition is hereby disposed of, Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No vide order , in pursuance to which the benefits were released to the both the petitioners, have also to the Principal, Accountant General, Learned thus, submits that nothing survives in the f the aforesaid orders along with copies of account statements of both the petitioners reflecting the payments released into their accounts handed over in Court by learned counsel for the petitioners here is no is , RISHU KATARIA 2025.09.26 11:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.