Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 71703 (ALL)

RAJ DAYAL VERMA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/21194/2025 · 2025-07-08

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:108812 Court No. - 34 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 21194 of 2025 Petitioner :- Raj Dayal Verma Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Satish Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J. 1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "I. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no.2 to expeditiously decide the Case No. 5790/9796/2025 (Computerized Case No.T202515090309796) (Raj Dayal Vs. Satyendra) U/s 34/35 of U.P. Revenue Code 2006 within a short time bound period as may be determined by this Hon'ble Court under the facts and circumstances of the case." 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that mutation proceedings under Section 34/35 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 are pending consideration before respondent no. 2. The sole prayer made in the writ petition is for expeditious disposal of the same. 3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents, with a direction upon respondent no. 2 to decide the Case No. 5790/9796/2025 (Computerized Case No.T202515090309796) (Raj Dayal Vs. Satyendra), in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. 4. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. Order Date :- 9.7.2025 V.S.Singh Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad