126 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-33534-2025 Date of Decision:02.07.2025 Davinder Singh and Anr. …Petitioners vs. State of Punjab and others …Respondents Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat Present: Mr. Rhythem Bajaj, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. I.P.S Sabharwal, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Harsh Neyol, Advocate for respondent No.4. *** N.S.Shekhawat J. (Oral) 1. The petitioners have filed the present petition under Section 528 of B.N.S.S with a prayer to issue appropriate directions to respondents No.1 and 2 to take strict legal action against the respondent No.4. A further prayer has been made to direct respondent No.2 to decide the representation dated 19.06.2025 (Annexure P-5), which was submitted by the petitioners. 2. On advance notice, Mr. I.P.S Sabharwal, DAG, Punjab has appeared on behalf of official respondents and submits that earlier a complaint was received from Monika Gupta wife of Harish Gupta, respondent No.4 and no substance was found in the complaint and the same was ordered to be consigned to record on 17.06.2025. Learned State counsel further submits that there is a civil dispute between the parties and they are unnecessarily dragging the police authorities in the matter. He next contends that at present, no HITESH 2025.07.02 16:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh CRM-M-33534-2025 -2 complaint is pending from either side with District Police, Fazilka. 3. Faced with the above, learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to press the present petition, at this stage. 4. Dismissed as not pressed, at this stage. (N.S.SHEKHAWAT) 02.07.2025 JUDGE hitesh Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No HITESH 2025.07.02 16:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh