Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 71690 (PNJ)

RAKSHAK LAMBA @ RAKSHAK v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CRA-S/2000/2025 · 2025-06-26

Suvir Sehgal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRA-S-2000-2025 101 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRA-S-2000-2025 Date of Decision :- 26.06.2025 Rakshak Lamba @ Rakshak .......Appellant Versus State of Haryana and others .......Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL Present: Mr. Sandeep Kumar Yadav, Advocate (THROUGH V.C.) and Ms. Deepika, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Sharad Aggarwal, Addl.A.G., Haryana. **** SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The present appeal has been against the order dated 23.06.2025 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Narnaul, whereby application of the appellant under Section 482 B.N.S.S. for grant of anticipatory bail in FIR No.47 dated 02.05.2025, under Sections 115, 191 (2), 191 (3), 351 (3) of BNS and Section 3 (2) (va) of SC/ST Act, registered at Police Station City, Kanina, was dismissed. 2. Advance copy of the petition has been served upon State. 3. State counsel has pointed out that the FIR has not been correctly BRIJ MOHAN 2025.06.26 14:13 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh CRA-S-2000-2025 101 -2- translated. 4. At this stage, counsel for the appellant seeks and is granted permission to withdraw the present appeal with liberty to file a fresh one. 5. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. 26.06.2025 (SUVIR SEHGAL) Brij JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No BRIJ MOHAN 2025.06.26 14:13 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh