Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 71690 (KAR)

SMT. YELLAMMA v. SRI. NAGARAJU

WP/5299/2021 · 2025-09-08

K Manmadha Rao

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35537 WP No. 5299 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO. 5299 OF 2021 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT.YELLAMMA W/O LATE SAMPANGAPPA @ BUDAGAPPA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS 2. SRI RAMACHANDRA S/O LATE SAMPANGAPPA @ BUDAGAPPA THROUGH HIS 1ST WIFE AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS 3. SMT. AMMAYAMMA W/O LATE KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS 4. SRI MANJUNATH S/O LATE KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS 5. SRI MURALI S/O LATE KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS 6. SRI SHEKAR S/O LATE KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS ALL ARE R/AT JIGANI VILLAGE AND HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT Digitally signed by VIJAYALAKSHMI B N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35537 WP No. 5299 of 2021 PIN CODE - 560105 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SHIVAKUMAR V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. NAGARAJU S/O LATE RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS 2. SRI DHANARAJU S/O LATE RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS 3. SRI SUBRAMANI S/O LATE RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS ALL ARE R/AT JIGANI VILLAGE AND HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT PIN CODE - 560105 …RESPONDENTS (RESPONDENTS SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DTD. 21.10.2020 GRANTING AN EX-PARTE INTERIM ORDER OF STATUS-QUO VIDE ANNX-C ON I.A.NO.1 FILED BY THE RESPONDENTS/ PLAINTIFFS UNDER ORDER 39 RULE 1 AND 2 OF CPC, PASSED BY THE HONBLE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANEKAL IN O.S.NO.713/2020 BY ALLOWING THE ABOVE WRIT PETITION IN THE ABOVE CASE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35537 WP No. 5299 of 2021 ORAL ORDER The petitioners' counsel files a memo for withdrawal of this writ petition and the same reads as follows: "Under signed counsel for the petitioner respectfully submits that the above writ petition may be dismissed/withdrawn as not pressed in the interest of justice and equity". 2. Memo is taken on record and this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (DR.K.MANMADHA RAO) JUDGE GSR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 52