1 2025:CGHC:37600 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1392 of 2019 1 - Rameshwari Bai Sona Wd/ Late Shri Chaituram Sona, Aged About 48 Years R/o Village Hasaud, Tahsil Jaijaipur, Police Station Hasaud, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Accountant General Of Chhattisgarh Zero Point, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 - Joint Director, Officer Of Treasury Account And Pension Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 4 - District Treasury Officer Office Of Treasury Account And Pension Janjgir District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh. 5 - General Manager State Bank Of India, Centralized Pension Processing Cell Behind Working Hostel Govindpura, Bhopal Mp Pin 462023 6 - General Manager State Bank Of India, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 7 - Branch Manager, State Bank Of India, Janjgir District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 8 - Branch Manager State Bank Of India, Branch Office Jaijaipur, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents AYUSHI SINGH Digitally signed by AYUSHI SINGH Date: 2025.08.01 11:14:00 +0530 2 For Petitioner : Mr. U.P. Koshaley, Advocate For State/ Respondents No.1 ,3 and 4 For Respondents No. 5 to 8 : : Mr. Amandeep Singh, PL Mr. P.R. Patankar, Advocate (Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Order on Board 31/07/2025 1. This case has been short listed for referral to the Special Mediation Drive-Mediation for the Nation. 2. There is no chance of settlement between the parties in the instant petition. Hence, the case is not referred for mediation in Mediation Drive - Mediation for the Nation. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents No.5 to 8 submits that, in compliance of order dated 27.2.2019, against excess payment made to the petitioner, 50% is being deducted from her family pension. He further submits that after recovery of complete excess payment, deduction will be stopped and petitioner will be provided full family pension. He next submits that as on date, petitioner’s actual family pension is Rs. 25,198/- per month, out of which, Rs. 10,247/- is being deducted per month and Rs. 14,951/- is being paid to the petitioner per month. He also submits that about Rs. 5,50,000/- has been recovered till date and after recovery of complete excess payment made to the petitioner, recovery will be stopped and full family pension will be paid to the petitioner. 4. In view of above contention made by learned counsel for the respondents No. 5 to 8, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that 3 he may be permitted to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to file fresh petition, if occasion arises. 5. On due consideration, permission is granted with liberty, as prayed for. 6. Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. SD/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) JUDGE Ayushi