- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:53356 CRP No. 311 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 311 OF 2024 (IO-) BETWEEN: SRI. S GOPALA REDDY AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS SON OF SAMPANGIRAMA REDDY, R/AT NO.1128, 11TH CROSS, 23RD MAIN ROAD, NEAR BANK OF BARODA, H.S.R.LAYOUT, SECTOR-1, NORTH, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK, BANGALORE - 560 102 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. B.R. VISWANATH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. K MUNIRAJAMMA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS W/O MUNISWAMAPPA, RESIDING AT DODDANAGAMANGALA VILLAGE, ELECTORNIC CITY POST, BEGUR HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK. 2. SMT. SHANTAMMA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS W/O LATE KUMAR, RESIDING AT PATTALAMMA NAGAR, BIDARAHALLI VILLAGE, VIRGONAGAR POST, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, BANGALORE - 560 049. Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:53356 CRP No. 311 of 2024 3. MR. VIJAY V AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS S/O LATE VEERAPPA, RESIDING AT NO.218, AYAPPA BLOCK, ANANDGIRI DEVASTHANA, CHOLANAYAKANAHALLI, BANGALORE - 560 032. 4. THE TAHSILDAR BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK BANGALORE - 586 123. 5. THE VILLAGE ACCOUNTANT KONAPANA AGRAHARA, BEGUR HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK, BANGALORE - 560 100. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. BHOJEGOUDA T. KOLLER, AGA FOR R4 AND R5; VIDE ORDER DATED 06.03.2024, NOTICE TO R1 AND R3 HELD SUFFICIENT, R1 - K MUNIRAJAMMA, R3 - VIJAY V; VIDE ORDER DATED 01.08.2022, APPEAL AGAINST R2 ABATED; VIDE ORDER DATED 17.08.2022 G. MANJUNATHA COUNSEL FOR R1 AND R3 BEFORE TRIA; COURT SERVED WITH NOTICE) THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 15.02.2017 PASSED ON I..NO.II IN OS .NO.1568/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU (RURAL) DISTRICT BENGALURU, DISMISSING THE I.A.NO.II FILED UNDER ORDER VII RULE 11 (a) AND (d) OF CPC FOR REJECTION OF PLAINT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:53356 CRP No. 311 of 2024 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER After addressing the arguments at length, learned counsel for the revision petitioner files a memo. Memo reads as under: “The counsel for the petitioner prays that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to withdraw the petition with liberty to urge grounds before the Trial Court in the interest of justice and equity.” Placing the memo on record, revision petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to advance all possible defences including the plea of res-judicata in the Trial Court in accordance with law. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE KAV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9