IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63199 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-127 Year-2025 Thana- SULTANGANJ District- Patna ====================================================== Neha Parween, Daughter Of Md. Sheru @ Sheru R/O -Neem Tal, Dargah, Karbala, Ps-Sultanganj, Dist-Patna ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mahtab Alam, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Satyendra Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA ORAL ORDER 2 10-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Sultanganj P.S. Case No. 127 of 2025 dated 22.03.2025 instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 317(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 3. The prosecution case, in short, is that on the alleged date of occurrence, the informant, who is a police personnel received information that at the house of Mohammad Sheru, some people are distributing stolen gold jewelleries. Thereafter, when the informant along with his team reached the spot, some people fled away but three persons including the petitioner were apprehended. It is alleged that two black coloured jewellery weighing machine, paper book of jewellery and a copy were recovered from a room of his house. It is alleged that the petitioner Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63199 of 2025(2) dt.10-09-2025 2/2 pushed a lady constable and fled away by throwing a pair of gold earrings. Some jewelleries have also been recovered from the possession of other two apprehended persons. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and she has been falsely implicated in this case. It is further submitted that neither the petitioner was arrested from the spot nor any articles were recovered from her possession or from her house. The petitioner is aged about 21 years. Lastly, it has been submitted that petitioner has no criminal antecedents. 5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. 6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in the event of arrest / surrender of the petitioner within a period of six weeks from today, in connection with Sultanganj P.S. Case No. 127 of 2025, she will be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Patna City, Patna subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. premchand/- (Khatim Reza, J) U T